DEVELOPING RICE VARIETIES WITH ENHANCED ADAPTATION TO COLD PRONE RICE GROWING AREAS UNDER LOWLAND RAIN FED CONDITIONS OF ETHIOPIA

PDF

Published: 2021-07-08

Page: 617-629


TADDESSE LAKEW *

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Fogera Rice Research and Training Center, Woreta, Ethiopia.

ABEBAW DESSIE

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Fogera Rice Research and Training Center, Woreta, Ethiopia.

ASAYE BERIE

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Fogera Rice Research and Training Center, Woreta, Ethiopia

BETELEHEM ASRAT

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Fogera Rice Research and Training Center, Woreta, Ethiopia.

DEJENE KEBEDE

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Jimma Agricultural Research Centre, Jimma, Ethiopia.

HAILEMARIAM SOLOMON

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Melkassa Agricultural Research Centre, Melkassa, Ethiopia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Sixteen lowland rice genotypes were arranged in a randomized complete block design of four replications and assessed for cold tolerance, performance and yield stability. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of genotype and environment for all traits studied while the interaction effect was significant for six of eleven traits. The AMMI analysis in grain yield showed that genotype, environment and their interaction were highly significant and the environment explained the highest variation, followed by the interaction. The first two multiplicative interaction principal component axes were highly significant and explained 83.8% of the interaction sum of squares. Spikelete fertility ranged from 89.9% (G1) to 97.8% (G9 and G11). Genotypes G4, G9, G11, G10, G12, G13 and G14 exhibited nearly complete panicle exesertion and high spikelet fertility indicating their tolerance to cold stress. AMMI 1 and GGE ranking biplots identified G4, G9, G11 and G12 as high yielding genotypes. While G9 was the best genotype in terms of mean yield, G4 was both high yielding and most stable genotype. Thus, genotypes that combine cold tolerance, high yield, and farmers’ preference (G4, G9 and G11) were verified and consequently, G9 and G11 were recommended for release in Fogera and similar areas.

Keywords: Rice genotype, cold tolerance, AMMI biplots, GGE biplots, grain yield.


How to Cite

LAKEW, T., DESSIE, A., BERIE, A., ASRAT, B., KEBEDE, D., & SOLOMON, H. (2021). DEVELOPING RICE VARIETIES WITH ENHANCED ADAPTATION TO COLD PRONE RICE GROWING AREAS UNDER LOWLAND RAIN FED CONDITIONS OF ETHIOPIA. Asian Journal of Advances in Research, 4(1), 617–629. Retrieved from https://jasianresearch.com/index.php/AJOAIR/article/view/101

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Data KS. Principles and practices of rice production. John Wiler & Sons, Inc. New York. 1981;642.

De GM, Thomas J, Liyanage R, Lay JO, Basu S. Cold tolerance response mechanisms revealed through comparative analysis of gene and protein expression in multiple rice genotypes. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0218019.

Islam Md, Rasel Md, Khanam S, Hassan L. Screaming of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes for cold Tolerance at seedling and reproductive Stages base on Morpho- Physiological Markers and Genetic Diversity Analysis. International Journal of Natural Science. 2020;10:58.

Ranawake AL, Nakamura C. Cold tolerance of an inbred line population of rice (Oryza sativa L) at different growth stages. Tropical Agricultural Research & Extension. 2011; 14(2):25-33.

Sharma N, Reinke R, Sacks EJ (2021). Comparison of methods to evaluate rice (Oryza sativa) germplasm for tolerance to low temperature at the seedling stage.

Lee M. Low temperature tolerance in rice : The Korean experience, in: Shu Fukai, Basnayake, J. (Eds.), increased lowland rice production in the Mekong region ACIAR Proceedings 101. IRRI, Makati, Philippines; 2001.

Shimono H, Okada M, Kanda E, Arakawa I. Low temperature-induced sterility in rice: Evidence for the effects of temperature before panicle initiation. Field Crops Research. 2007; 101:221–231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.11.010.

Sarita PK Jhansi R, Damodar RC. Cold tolerance in rice at seedling and reproductive stage. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2017;6(6):984-988.

Jacobs BC, Pearson CJ. Cold damage and development of rice: a conceptual model. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 1994;34:917-919.

Renata PC, Sandra CKM, Luiz CF. Inheritance of panicle exertion in rice. Science Agriculture. 2008;65(5):502-507.

Takahashi N. Differentiation of ecotypes in Oryza sativa L. In: Takahashi N and Tsunoda S. (Ed.) Biology of rice. Tokyo: Japanese Scientific Society. 1984;31-67.

Dessie A, Lakew T, Zewdu Z, Asrat B, Atnaf M, et al. Green Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Variety Evaluation Under Rain Fed Conditions in Ethiopia. Journal of Rice Research. 2020;8: 229.

Zelalem Z, Abebaw D, Mulugeta A. Evaluation of yield and yield components of lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in the rainfed-lowland rice producing areas of Ethiopia. Acadamic Research Journal Agricultural Research. 2020;7(7):569-576.

Ogunbayo, et al. Comparative performance of forty-eight rice genotypes in diverse environments using AMMI and GGE biplot analysis. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics. 2014;8(3):139-152.

Gauch HG. Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, 519 Bradfield Hall, Ithaca, NY. 2006;14853.

Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal. 1988;80:388-393.

Yan W. GGE biplot-A windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal. 2001;93:1111-1118.

Yan W, Kang MS. GGE-biplot Analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRS press, Boca Raton, FL; 2003.

IRRI. Standard Evaluation System for Rrice. Rice knowledge Bank. IRRI, Philippines; 1996.

SAS Institute Inc. Version 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC; 2002.

Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science. 2000;40:597-605.

Bantayehu M, Esmael J, Awoke Y. Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction Analysis and Clustering of Environments and Genotypes in Malting Barley. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2013;8(18):1896-1904.

Yan W, Hunt LA. Interpretation of genotype x environment interactions: An Empirical Comparison. Agronomy Journal. 2001;87:121-126.

Bharat TJ, Serial AK, Saharan RP, Harikesh HA. AMMI biplot analysis for stability in basamati roce (Oryza sativa L.) in different production systems. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2018;9(2):502-510.

Tekdal S, Kendal E. AMMI Model to Assess Durum Wheat Genotypes in Multi-Environment Trials. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology. 2018;20:153-166.

Lingaiah N, Chandra BS, Venkanna V, Rukmini DK and Hari Y. AMMI Bi plot analysis for genotype x environment interaction on yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2020;9(3):1384-1388.

Yan W, Tinker NA. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2006;86:626-645.