EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA: AN EVALUATION

PDF

Published: 2020-08-22

Page: 315-328


SHYAM PRAKASH PANDEY *

University of Delhi, India and Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

This paper is an attempt to study the evolution and development of concept of judicial review in India. Judicial review is basically an aspect of judicial power of the state which is exercised by the courts to determine the validity of a rule of law or an action of any agency of the state. It originated in English legal system and became a very important principle in the systems of government based on Rule of Law. The Constitution of U.S.A. makes no specific reference to the judicial review of legislation. However, Chief Justice Lord Coke’s decision in Bonham’s laid down the foundation of Judicial Review of legislation in the United States of America, which has now become one of the most outstanding features for the operation of that Constitution. In India, judicial review is not an event of sudden emergence but its gradual evolution depended on the constitutional ideas in different stages of Indian constitutional history. Constitution of India, 1950 explicitly establishes the Doctrine of Judicial Review under various Articles of the Constitution.

Keywords: Aphidocolous ants, Judicial review, A. gossypii Glover, legislature, mutualism, executive, brinjal, judiciary, constitution


How to Cite

PANDEY, S. P. (2020). EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA: AN EVALUATION. Asian Journal of Advances in Research, 3(1), 315–328. Retrieved from https://jasianresearch.com/index.php/AJOAIR/article/view/210

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Marbury v. Madson 5 US (Cranch)137(1803) Available in this link:

Available:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/

Hylton v. United States3 Dall, 171 (1796)

Available:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/3/171/

Marbury v. Madson 5 US (Cranch)137(1803)

Available:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/

Van Horn’s Lessee v. Durance 2Dallas 304 (1795)

Available:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/2/304/

Marbury v. Madison 5 US (Cranch)137(1803) Available:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/

McCulloch v. Maryland 4 Wheaton 316(1819)

Available:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/17/316/

Marbury v.Madison 5 US (Cranch)137(1803)

Available:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/5/137/

Emperor v. Burrah 1877 (3) ILR 63 Cal.

Secretary of State v. Moment 1913(40) ILR 391 Cal

Available:https://www.legitquest.com/case/secretary-of-state-v-mask-and-co/1c1011

Annie Besant v. Government of Madras 1918 AIR 1210 Mad

Available:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/882142/

Minerva Mills case AIR 1980 SC 1789

Available:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1939993/

Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action v. Union of India (2011) 8 SCC 161 (220)

Available:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1356184/

Gopal Das v. Union of India (2011) 4 SCC 300 (301)

Available:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/763703