INDIVIDUAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (ISR) INDICATOR IN EDUCATION

PDF

Published: 2020-08-04

Page: 263-268


SANDIP RATNA *

State College of Teacher Education, Kohima, Nagaland, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Education is one of the most important tools in the hand of humans to educate its population and to use its intellect for humanity. Education as a tool used by authorities is to educate the population for the purpose of establishing peace and harmony in society and thereby bring development, and activate human resource for the same. In any educational system, educational authorities determine the purpose   and objectives of education.  Educational objectives are dynamic in nature, and are determined as per the demand of society. If we look at the 21st century needs, life skill is   one of the important aspects in bringing   all-round development of a child.    

This paper therefore, focuses on the effect of social media platform on individuals and how life skills in education can be implemented to enhance self-responsibility and accountability in society. A systematic practice and monitoring model termed as Individual Social Responsibility (ISR) is articulated, which may be incorporated with basic education at an early stage of a child, and maintained the same throughout the life of an individual.

Social unrest emerges, due to certain influences in social media platform is an evolving issue around the glove and possible preventive measures through the right education are focused upon.

Keywords: Social unrest, compatibility, responsibility, accountability, social responsibility


How to Cite

RATNA, S. (2020). INDIVIDUAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (ISR) INDICATOR IN EDUCATION. Asian Journal of Advances in Research, 3(1), 263–268. Retrieved from https://jasianresearch.com/index.php/AJOAIR/article/view/216

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brockman, John. Is the internet changing the way you think?: The Net's Impact on Our Minds and Future. 2011 ed. New York: Harper Perennial. 2011;451(2).

Deen Hana S, John A. Hendricks. Social media: Usage and impact. 2012 ed. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. 2012;307.

Jacobs Tom. The link between depression and terrorism; 2014.

Available:http://books-andculture/antidepressants-depression-terrorism-weapon

O'keeffe GS, Clarke-Pearson K. The impact of social media on children, adolescents and families. Pediatrics. 2011;800-04.

Mark W. Becker, Reem Alzahabi and Christopher J. Hopwood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking; 2013.

Amedie, Jacob. The Impact of Social Media on Society. Pop Culture Intersections. 2015;2.

Available:https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/engl_176/2

Dewey Taylor, Kaden Juliane, Marks Miriam, Matsushima Shun, Zhu, Beijing. The impact of social media on social unrest in the Arab Spring. Stanford, CA Stanford University; 2012.

Soundarya S. Social responsibility: A contemporary approach towards sustainable development. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM). 2002;40-43.

[e-ISSN: 2278-487X]

[p-ISSN: 2319-7668]

Available:www.iosrjournals.org

Tharp J, Chadhury PD. Corporate social responsibility: What it means for the project manager. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2008—North America, Denver, CO. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute; 2008.

Dhir Rajeev. Creditworthiness.” Investopedia; 2020.

Available:https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/credit-worthiness.asp

(Retrieved on 24/07/2020)

John Elkington in his 1997 book Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Sustainable Development, was most famously defined by the Brundtland Commission of the United Nations; 1987.

The Hindu page no.15; 2013.

International Institute for Sustainable Development. The triple bottom line". Business and Sustainable Development: A Global Guide; 2011.

Available:Bsdglobal.com

(Retrieved 2013-04-04)

Brown D, Dillard J, Marshall RS. Triple bottom line: A business metaphor for a social construct." Portland State University, School of Business Administration; 2006.

)Retrieved on: 2007-07-18)

Kumar, Satish. Ahmad, Sajjad. Meaning, Aims and Process of Education; 2015.

RS https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ec0b/b4e95baef9644b46b0a8d81c17fcbe14eb0f.pdf

(Retrieved on 22/07/2020)

Tripathi RC. Education for values in schools – A framework; 2002.

Available:http://www.ncert.nic.in/departments/nie/depfe/Final.pdf Retrieved on 22/07/2020.

IGNOU, Unit 24, Continuous evaluation in English.

Available:www.egyankosh.ac.in/ bitstream/123456789/26477/1/Unit-24.pdf

CBSE. Manual for teachers on school based assessment classes VI to VIII. New Delhi: CBSE; 2010.

Falayajo W. Philosophy and theory of continuous assessment. A paper presented at a workshop for Inspectors of Education in Odor State, Nigeria; 1986.

ARG. Assessment for learning: 10 principles, Research-based principles to guide classroom practice; 2002.

Available:http:// www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk

W Reynolds George. Ethics in Information Technology” 3rd Ed; 2010.

Available:https://www.ime.usp.br/~tassio/TMP/bks/32983_053874622X.pdf Retrieved on 32/07/2020.

Baker Lee W. The credibility factor: Putting ethics to work in public relations. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin; 1993.

Bok, Sissela. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Vintage Books; 1999.

Cooper Thomas W, Clifford G. Christians, Frances Forde Plude, and Robert A. White, eds. Communication Ethics and Global Change. White Plains, NY: Longman; 1989.

CRS Report. Free Speech and the Regulation of Social Media Content” Congreeional Research Service; 2019.

Available:https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45650.pdf

(Retrieved on 22/07/2020)

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Human Rights, Terrorism and Counter-terrorism.

Available:https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/factsheet32en.pdf

(Retrieved on 22/07/2020)

Rainie Lee. Anderson, Janna. Albright, Jonathan. The future of free speech, trolls, anonymity and fake news online” Pew Research Centre; 2017.

Available:https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/03/29/the-future-of-free-speech-trolls-anonymity-and-fake-news-online/

(Retrieved on 22/07/2020)

International Institute for Sustainable Development. The triple bottom line". Business and Sustainable Development: A Global Guide; 2011.

Available:Bsdglobal.com

Sreenivasulu E. Performance standards for social responsibility in education a case study. International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology. 2013;2(5).

[ISSN 2278-7763]

How do you show a positive attitude toward your fellow employees?" eNotes Editorial; 2012.

Available:https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/how-do-you-show-positive-attitude-toward-your-344431

(Accessed 23 July 2020)

Tom Robinson, Jessica Zurcher, Clark Callahan. Youthful ideals of older adults: An analysis of children's drawings. Educational Gerontology. 2015;41(6):440-450.

Lisa Hollis-Sawyer, Lorilene Cuevas. Mirror, mirror on the wall: Ageist and sexist double jeopardy portrayals in children's picture books. Educational Gerontology. 2013;39(12):902-914.

W. Schulz, et al. Students’ Attitudes toward Important Issues in Society. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)., Becoming Citizens in a Changing World; 2018.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73963-2_5

Nicole Bauer, Monica Vasile, Maria Mondini. Attitudes towards nature, wilderness and protected areas: A way to sustainable stewardship in the South-Western Carpathians, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2018;61:5-6:857-877.

DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1382337

Gizem Arikan, Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom. Social values and Cross-National Differences in Attitudes towards Welfare.” Political Studies; 2014.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12100