Genetic Interaction Studies in Soybean Plants Prepared Using Sodium Azide and its Effect on Several Traits in the M2 Generation
En. Yara A. Zarba *
Department of Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria.
Muhammad Nael Khattab
Department of Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria.
Youssef Muhammad
Department of Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Tishreen University, Latakia, Syria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The research was done in the coastal region (of Syria) at Tishreen University during the agricultural seasons 2022-2023. The research included exposing the seeds of three genotypes of soybeans (sb44, sb239, and sb337) which were obtained from the General Authority for Agricultural research for mutagenesis using the chemical mutagen Sodium Azide (NaN3) in concentrations (0 mM, 1 mM, 2 mM, 3 mM, and 4 mM) with soaking it for different periods of time (4, 8, and 12 hours) within each concentration. In the purpose of studying the effect of Sodium azide concentrations and the periods of soaking on some morphologies, productive and quality traits of the three genotypes, in addition to determining the best concentration of sodium azide, soaking period and genotype of soybeans that has good productivity and quality. The results obtained indicated the presence of new mutations affected many morphological traits and production components, and the chemical mutagen is effective in causing mutations in soybeans with a different response from the genotype to the different concentrations and periods of soaking, as there was for the concentration C1 (1 mM) the biggest positive effect and stimulating on the most of the studied traits and dependent on it many plants were nominated and a significant decrease in most of the traits of the second generation (M2) plants with increasing the soaking period. Also a gradual decrease in the most of studied traits with the increasing concentrations of the mutagen and the increase of the soaking periods within each concentration. Additionally, there were the best interactions values at concentration C1 (1mM) and time T1 (4 hours of soaking).
Keywords: Soybean, chemical mutations, sodium azide, introduced mutations
How to Cite
Downloads
References
An W, Zhao H, Shandong Y, Wang Y, Li Q, Zhuang B, Cong L, Liu B. Genetic diversity in annual wild soybean (Glycine soja sieb. ET zucc.) And cultivated soybean (G. max. Merr.) From different latitudes in China. Pak. J. Bot. 2009;41(5):2229-2242.
Mathur S. Soybean wonder legume. Beverage Food World. 2004;31(1):61–62.
Liu K. Soybeans: Chemistry, technology and utilization. Aspen publishers, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA. 1997;532.
Maala, Mohammed Yahya, Harba, Nizar Ali. Field Crop Breeding – Publications of Tishreen University; 2005.
Rahman MM, Bashar MK, Rahul MG. Molecular characterization and genetic variation in rice, LAP: Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH and Co. KG, Saarbrucken, Germany. 2011;1-45.
Singh G. The soybean: Botany, production and uses: The origin and history of soybean, Qui LJ, Chang RZ. CAB International. 2010;1-23.
Micke A, Donini B. (Use of induced Mutation in Improvement of seed prorogated Crops. Joint FAO Vienna. Austria. 1981;2-10.
Raghuvanshi, Himendra Raj, Kalaiselvi P, Dileep V, Abhishek Singh S, Jigile, Anushi, Naik Reema Ravindra, Vijay Kumar. Biotechnological breakthroughs: Paving the path to cleaner and more productive agriculture through bioremediation. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology. 2024;27(4):119-42. Available:https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i4746
Ali, Amal A, Aziza S, El-Kholy. Isolation and characterization of Endophytic kosakonia radicincitans to stimulate wheat growth in saline Soil. Journal of Advances in Microbiology. 2022;22(11):115-26. Available:https://doi.org/10.9734/jamb/2022/v22i11698
Whitham TG, Slobodchikoff CN. Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: the adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia. 1981;49:287-92.
Brock RD. The role of induced mutations in plant improvement. Radiation Botany. 1971;11(3):181-96.
Ali, Hameed Gloub. Principles of Crop Breeding and Genetics. Directorate of Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing, University of Mosul, Iraq; 1988.
Borejko AM. Production of induced mutations in soybean. Genetike Moskva. 1970;6:167-169
Oderigah PGC, Osayinpeju AO, Myers GO. Induced Male sterility in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculats L. walp) J. Genet Breeding. 1996;50:171-173.8.
Ikhajiagbe B, Oshomoh EO, Ebohon F. Growth and yield studies of five local edible pulses in Benin City, Nigeria, exposed to environmental stress occasioned by waste engine oil pollution. Journal of Laboratory Science. 2012;1 (2):44–56.
Hajduch MF, Debre, Bahmora B, Pretora A. Effect of different mutagenic treatment son morphological traits of M2 generation of soybean genetics. Newsletter 26 (online journal).U.RL; 1999.
Available:hutt/ www. Soy genetics. org. /articles/ sgn 1999-005. Htm (posted 24 mar 1999).
Oderigah PGC, Osayinpeju AO. 6.0. Myers. Induced mutations in cowpea (Vigna unguiculats L. Walp) (Leguminous) Vienna, Austria; 1998.
Biswas AK, Bhatta Chary NK. Induced polyploidy in legumes. Cytological. 1977; 36:469-479.
Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K, Muysa B, Coppin P, Weiss M, Baret F. Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2004; 121:19–35
Ahire DD, Thengane RJ, Manjaya JG, George M, Bhide SV. Induced mutations in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) Cv. MACS 450. Soybean Research. 2005;3: 1–8.
Romero M, Ortizy R, Ponce M. Radio sensibilidad de semillas de soya a los raids gamma CO60. Cultivos tropicales. Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agricola's (INCA). Cuba. 2000;21(2):43-47
Cheng Q, Dong L, Su T, Li T, Gan Z, Nan H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted Mutagenesis of GmLHY genes alters plant height and internode length in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19 :562.
Al-Adhari, Adnan Hassan Mohammed. Fundamentals of Genetics. Directorate of Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing, University of Mosul, Iraq; 1987.
Horn LN, Ghebrehiwot HM, Shimelis HA. Selection of novel cowpea genotypes derived through gamma irradiation. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:262.
Karthika R, Ana BS, Lakshmi. Effect of Gamma Rays EMS on two varieties of Soybean. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2006;5(4):721-724.
Hanan HL, Abdalla MA, Farag SA. Radio-stimulation of phytohormons and bioactive components of coriander seedlings. Turkish J. Biochem. 2011;36: 230–236.
Essel E, Asante IK, Laing E. Effect of colchicine treatment on seed germination, plant growth and yield traits of cowpea (Vigna unguiculats (L.) Walp). Can. J. Appl. Sci. 2015;9:3573–3576
Kumar VA, Vairam N, Amutha R. Effect of physical mutagen on expression of characters in arid legume pulse cowpea (Vigna unguiculats (L.) Walp.). Electra. J. Plant Breed. 2010;1:908–914.
Ibrahim, Alexander Francis, Ibrahim Shaban Al-Saadawi, Khuzayel Khudair Al-Janabi. Applications in Nuclear Techniques in Plant Studies. Publications of the Iraqi Atomic Energy Organization, Babel Printing Press, Baghdad, Iraq; 1990.
Tambe AB, Apparao. Gamma Rays induced mutation in Soybean for yield-contributing traits. Induced plant mutation in the genomics. Era. FAO, Rome96; 2009.
AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official methods of analyses, Virginia; 1990.