Assessment of the Socio-Economic Burden of Trypanosomiasis Infection in Selected Tsetse Endemic Communities of Enugu South L. G. A.
Victor Stephen Njom *
Applied Biology and Biotechnology Department, Enugu State University of Science and Technology Enugu, Nigeria.
Iyam Orok Iyam
Nigeria Institute for Trypanosomiasis (and Onchocerciasis) Research (NITR) Southeast Zona Office, Enugu, P M B 1660 Indp layout, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Awam, Chibueze Odi
Nigeria Institute for Trypanosomiasis (and Onchocerciasis) Research (NITR) Southeast Zona Office, Enugu, P M B 1660 Indp layout, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Obilor Charles Ifeanyichukwu
Nigeria Institute for Trypanosomiasis (and Onchocerciasis) Research (NITR) Southeast Zona Office, Enugu, P M B 1660 Indp layout, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Obini, Felicia Udu
Nigeria Institute for Trypanosomiasis (and Onchocerciasis) Research (NITR) Southeast Zona Office, Enugu, P M B 1660 Indp layout, Enugu State, Nigeria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) is a debilitating public health disease of the poor. It is transmitted mainly by tsetse flies. The abundance of this fly in an area is correlated with the disease prevalence. A significant gap exists in current knowledge regarding trypanosomiasis and its socio-economic impacts in Enugu State. Despite limited available research, the resurgence of tsetse fauna, coupled with climate change, social instability, and disruptions in disease surveillance, underscores the urgent need for updated information This study accessed the socio-economic impacts of HAT in Akwuke and Ugwuaji communities of Enugu State Nigeria. Pre pre-tested structured questionnaire was used to collect information about the knowledge of the vector, the disease and its social and economic impacts. The study recruited 347 participants and results revealed that 255 of the respondents (73%) demonstrated a solid understanding of tsetse flies while 159 (46%) have knowledge of the disease trypanosomiasis. A total of 14 (4%) claimed to have been previously diagnosed with the disease and 12 (3.5%) of them were out of work /farm activities when sick. The cost of treatment and hospitalization was borne by 13 (37%). However, stigmatization was reported by one person (0.3%). Therefore, it is imperative that health education intervention be carried out to improve knowledge concerning the disease, thereby improving the health seeking behavior in both communities. Active surveillance and integrated tsetse control approach should be considered in both study areas.
Keywords: Trypanosomiasis, surveillance, respondents, fauna, tsetse-fly, stigmatization, disease